From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9978 invoked by alias); 13 Jun 2006 21:15:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 9969 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Jun 2006 21:15:29 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from viper.snap.net.nz (HELO viper.snap.net.nz) (202.37.101.8) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 21:15:26 +0000 Received: from kahikatea.snap.net.nz (p375-tnt1.snap.net.nz [202.124.111.121]) by viper.snap.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F83676B62E; Wed, 14 Jun 2006 09:15:25 +1200 (NZST) Received: by kahikatea.snap.net.nz (Postfix, from userid 500) id 800B41D3550; Wed, 14 Jun 2006 09:14:37 +1200 (NZST) From: Nick Roberts MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17551.10938.599796.89658@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 21:15:00 -0000 To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] MI Doco In-Reply-To: References: <17535.33986.598009.914783@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <17536.4472.263731.425097@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <17538.8607.697546.427486@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <17546.915.125070.943811@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <17547.15381.217912.425365@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <17547.60705.62123.543072@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <17548.36381.999594.50258@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <17549.1830.40223.127804@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <20060613044551.030C51D3550@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 22.0.50.20 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-06/txt/msg00204.txt.bz2 > > > Now please post only the new parts, the ones I've never seen. Please > > > don't commit anything before that. > > > > I'm not sure where this is leading because at some stage I will want to > > commit the parts that you have already seen and approved. It would be > > easier for me to commit those now and submit a patch for the new parts, > > so that there is no more confusion about what you are approving. Would > > that be OK? > > I no longer have a clear idea what do you mean by ``those'' patches > that you want to commit. No, but I have a clear idea about what you have approved and what you may not have seen. You could choose to trust me. > Please help me see the light. > > I've read and approved the patch you posted here: > > http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2006-06/msg00030.html > > subject to the comments in my response here: > > http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2006-06/msg00104.html > > You responded with this message: > > http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2006-06/msg00117.html > > where you seemed to say that the patch included in the message was the > previous one, with my comments fixed and some node reordering. I > approved the reordering, which I thought to be the only new part (in > http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2006-06/msg00121.html). If the > patch from msg00117.html included something other than what I thought > it did, please tell me where to look to find the new parts. Clearly they're in msg00117.html, more specifically everything after and including "@subsubheading A Bad Command". > I cannot > approve something I didn't review, and if I have to read it all anew, > it will have to wait for at least a week, as I won't have enough time > before that. The changes are quite simple although the patch may not look it. I've removed the MI commands related to "display" and I've split a node. It's just that these two changes overlap in the patch. -- Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob