From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16791 invoked by alias); 9 Apr 2006 21:53:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 16783 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Apr 2006 21:53:00 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from viper.snap.net.nz (HELO viper.snap.net.nz) (202.37.101.8) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sun, 09 Apr 2006 21:52:57 +0000 Received: from farnswood.snap.net.nz (p202-124-114-42.snap.net.nz [202.124.114.42]) by viper.snap.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB813752261; Mon, 10 Apr 2006 09:52:53 +1200 (NZST) Received: by farnswood.snap.net.nz (Postfix, from userid 500) id 1074162A99; Sun, 9 Apr 2006 22:52:41 +0100 (BST) From: Nick Roberts MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17465.33321.414493.769813@farnswood.snap.net.nz> Date: Sun, 09 Apr 2006 21:53:00 -0000 To: "David S. Miller" Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH]: Fix gdb.mi/mi-regs.exp Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-04/txt/msg00113.txt.bz2 > 2006-04-08 David S. Miller > * gdb.mi/mi-regs.exp (111-data-list-register-values x): "No registers" > will get printed without a mi_cmd_data_list_register_values prefix. > (*-data-list-register-*): Correct regular expressions to expect the new > pseudo d? floating point registers. Do you need to apply these changes to mi2-regs.exp also? Should there be similar tests for other architectures? If they are only intended for sparc, shouldn't this file be called mi-sparc-regs.exp? -- Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob