From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29855 invoked by alias); 18 Jun 2005 01:28:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 29830 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Jun 2005 01:28:49 -0000 Received: from viper.snap.net.nz (HELO viper.snap.net.nz) (202.37.101.8) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jun 2005 01:28:49 +0000 Received: from farnswood.snap.net.nz (p29-tnt2.snap.net.nz [202.124.108.29]) by viper.snap.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 842FE56320A; Sat, 18 Jun 2005 13:28:46 +1200 (NZST) Received: by farnswood.snap.net.nz (Postfix, from userid 501) id 5103D62A99; Sat, 18 Jun 2005 02:29:54 +0100 (BST) From: Nick Roberts MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17075.30993.384316.356236@farnswood.snap.net.nz> Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 01:28:00 -0000 To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] -stack-info-frames In-Reply-To: <20050617231425.GA22254@nevyn.them.org> References: <17075.21529.964955.923197@farnswood.snap.net.nz> <20050617230130.GB21178@nevyn.them.org> <20050617231425.GA22254@nevyn.them.org> X-SW-Source: 2005-06/txt/msg00272.txt.bz2 > Is "-stack-info-frame N" basically the same as "-stack-list-frames N N"? I didn't allow -stack-info-frame an argument. OK, lets forget this implementation. Perhaps we could add something about "-stack-list-frames N N" in the documentation. I know its kind of obvious, but I didn't realise initially. How about the rest of the patch: (mi_cmd_stack_list_frames, mi_cmd_stack_info_depth): Don't test for stack. (mi_cmd_stack_select_frame): Do not allow an argument. Don't test for stack. Nick