From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19494 invoked by alias); 17 Jun 2005 23:31:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 19470 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Jun 2005 23:31:10 -0000 Received: from viper.snap.net.nz (HELO viper.snap.net.nz) (202.37.101.8) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2005 23:31:10 +0000 Received: from farnswood.snap.net.nz (p96-tnt2.snap.net.nz [202.124.108.96]) by viper.snap.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF2BF5479F3; Sat, 18 Jun 2005 11:31:06 +1200 (NZST) Received: by farnswood.snap.net.nz (Postfix, from userid 501) id 8DA5962A99; Sat, 18 Jun 2005 00:24:29 +0100 (BST) From: Nick Roberts MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17075.23468.956260.835272@farnswood.snap.net.nz> Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 23:31:00 -0000 To: Jason Molenda Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] -stack-info-frames In-Reply-To: <56871229-51F7-444C-9AE3-2379D67488D2@apple.com> References: <17075.21529.964955.923197@farnswood.snap.net.nz> <56871229-51F7-444C-9AE3-2379D67488D2@apple.com> X-SW-Source: 2005-06/txt/msg00271.txt.bz2 > NB: I don't have any objection to -stack-info-frame; some other GUI > designer may find it a convenient command. And it's hardly a burden > code-wise in gdb to support the command. It might be nice if there > was a simple test case added for it at the same time, but that's my > only comment. Sure. Perhaps adding the test could be a condition to approving the patch. I'm finding my way a bit, and I don't want to have write more tests than I need to. Nick