From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22897 invoked by alias); 4 Jan 2017 22:10:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 22879 invoked by uid 89); 4 Jan 2017 22:10:46 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=H*Ad:D*nl, HX-Greylist:EST, Hx-languages-length:983, HX-Greylist:0500 X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: mail.baldwin.cx Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (HELO mail.baldwin.cx) (96.47.65.170) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Jan 2017 22:10:44 +0000 Received: from ralph.baldwin.cx (c-73-231-226-104.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [73.231.226.104]) by mail.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 29DD310B5CF; Wed, 4 Jan 2017 17:10:43 -0500 (EST) From: John Baldwin To: Luis Machado Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, binutils@sourceware.org, "Maciej W. Rozycki" , Mark Kettenis Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] Add FreeBSD/mips architecture. Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2017 22:10:00 -0000 Message-ID: <1705214.U73jUJvlEx@ralph.baldwin.cx> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (FreeBSD/11.0-STABLE; KDE/4.14.10; amd64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <1ffeffc2-ea41-8357-a00d-7fafb0c59b17@codesourcery.com> References: <20170103184341.58346-1-jhb@FreeBSD.org> <20170103184341.58346-3-jhb@FreeBSD.org> <1ffeffc2-ea41-8357-a00d-7fafb0c59b17@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-01/txt/msg00066.txt.bz2 On Wednesday, January 04, 2017 03:23:00 PM Luis Machado wrote: > Hi, > > Did this get pushed? I thought we were waiting for Maciej to provide > feedback? I did not push the binutils change, only the gdb ones (they are independent). Between Pedro's earlier comments and yours (which I had taken as approval), I figured the GDB ones were fine and didn't want to keep reposting them while hashing out the binutils change. (I've seen some other patch series go by where a subset of patches were committed earlier while other patches were reworked.) > Also please note i only review, i don't approve. Mark Kettenis would be > the one to approve native FreeBSD bits (if the MAINTAINERS file is still > up-to-date). > > Or maybe that has changed? If so, the MAINTAINERS file needs to be updated. Hmm, I misinterpreted your comments as approval then. Most of my recent FreeBSD changes have been approved by Pedro Alves. -- John Baldwin