From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1567 invoked by alias); 12 May 2003 19:16:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 16005 invoked from network); 12 May 2003 19:13:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hub.ott.qnx.com) (209.226.137.76) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 12 May 2003 19:13:00 -0000 Received: from smtp.ott.qnx.com (smtp.ott.qnx.com [10.0.2.158]) by hub.ott.qnx.com (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA14027; Mon, 12 May 2003 15:09:40 -0400 Received: from catdog ([10.4.2.2]) by smtp.ott.qnx.com (8.8.8/8.6.12) with SMTP id PAA13390; Mon, 12 May 2003 15:12:56 -0400 Message-ID: <16d001c318ba$7eaa0080$0202040a@catdog> From: "Kris Warkentin" To: "Andrew Cagney" Cc: "Gdb-Patches@Sources.Redhat.Com" References: <16b401c318b2$c4ced340$0202040a@catdog> <3EBFEA30.3040108@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [patch] remove pointless call. Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 19:16:00 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00189.txt.bz2 > > Okay to apply? The TARGET_FIND_AND_OPEN_SOLIB removes the need for this > > call. > > Yes (obvious?). Is it in general okay to just post and apply patches to my own files if they're obvious? Do I need to be put down as a target specific maintainer or some such? cheers, Kris