From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29568 invoked by alias); 1 Apr 2005 11:01:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 28196 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2005 11:00:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO viper.snap.net.nz) (202.37.101.8) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 1 Apr 2005 11:00:21 -0000 Received: from farnswood.snap.net.nz (p215-tnt1.snap.net.nz [202.124.110.215]) by viper.snap.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8EFE4AB484; Fri, 1 Apr 2005 23:00:19 +1200 (NZST) Received: by farnswood.snap.net.nz (Postfix, from userid 501) id 7918E61EE4; Fri, 1 Apr 2005 12:00:35 +0100 (BST) From: Nick Roberts MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16973.10706.863149.67313@farnswood.snap.net.nz> Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2005 11:01:00 -0000 To: Bob Rossi Cc: Andrew Cagney , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH: gdb/mi + doco] -var-update In-Reply-To: <20050401024942.GA2179@white> References: <16919.7660.144228.334687@farnswood.snap.net.nz> <01c5167f$Blat.v2.4$9a7a6f60@zahav.net.il> <16919.53411.753668.336933@farnswood.snap.net.nz> <01c51709$Blat.v2.4$4a3292a0@zahav.net.il> <16921.18627.457594.938060@farnswood.snap.net.nz> <01c517d0$Blat.v2.4$09a26040@zahav.net.il> <16922.43915.346792.973282@farnswood.snap.net.nz> <01c51898$Blat.v2.4$f6fd05c0@zahav.net.il> <16929.8147.933720.246602@farnswood.snap.net.nz> <16955.41017.161288.832646@farnswood.snap.net.nz> <20050401024942.GA2179@white> X-SW-Source: 2005-04/txt/msg00005.txt.bz2 > > I would like to commit this (source code) patch from last month. I > > accidently reverted some of changes last time I presented it so I attach > > it here in its proper form. > > > > As Andrew doesn't appear to around is there any chance a global maintainer > > can look at it? Its pretty lightweight. > > Hi Nick, > > I have some spare time waiting for my patches to get reviewed, so I > figure'd I'd look at yours. If you care, I have just a few comments. With all the MI maintainers off the radar screen its all a bit hypothetical but please do comment. Nick