From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27463 invoked by alias); 26 Jan 2005 10:19:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 27337 invoked from network); 26 Jan 2005 10:19:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO viper.snap.net.nz) (202.37.101.8) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 26 Jan 2005 10:19:39 -0000 Received: from farnswood.snap.net.nz (p1-tnt2.snap.net.nz [202.124.108.1]) by viper.snap.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E1D82888F7; Wed, 26 Jan 2005 23:19:38 +1300 (NZDT) Received: by farnswood.snap.net.nz (Postfix, from userid 501) id 1B8DC628AD; Wed, 26 Jan 2005 10:01:55 +0000 (GMT) From: Nick Roberts Message-ID: <16887.27283.513623.694383@farnswood.snap.net.nz> Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 10:19:00 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] interpreter_exec_cmd (interps.c) In-Reply-To: <41F66552.4010909@gnu.org> References: <16886.6823.347734.738143@farnswood.snap.net.nz> <41F66552.4010909@gnu.org> X-SW-Source: 2005-01/txt/msg00252.txt.bz2 > Hmm, another example is: > > (gdb) interpreter console help foo > > Can you create a new minimal test "gdb.base/interpreter.exp" to sanity > check one of the above (and add anything else that takes your fancy :-) > > Be sure to check that the test actually fails without the test (and > don't forget to mention the system it was tested on). Consider that > pre-approved. I'll have a go shortly. However, I'll post it here to check my own sanity first. :-) Nick