From: Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com>
To: Richard Sandiford <rsandifo@redhat.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, java-patches@gcc.gnu.org,
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org, binutils@sources.redhat.com,
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Factor configure-time gcc version checks (patch 1/4 for PR 7305)
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 10:37:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <16807.1802.438507.501707@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87is7tejx4.fsf@redhat.com>
Richard Sandiford writes:
> So... the four patches are as follows:
>
> (1) Provide a config/gcc-version.m4 fragment to work out
> $gcc_version_trigger, $gcc_version_full and $gcc_version.
>
> (2) Remove config.if.
>
> (3) Provide a config/gxx-include-dir.m4 fragment and use it
> in the top-level configuration file.
>
> (4) The main libjava patch.
>
> Part (1) is attached below. The logic used in the new autoconf fragment
> is mostly taken from config.if.
>
> Patch bootstrapped & regression tested (on its own) on i686-pc-linux-gnu.
> I also checked that:
>
> - The top-level configure gets the right version and version trigger.
>
> - The top-level makefile still passes --with-gcc-version-trigger
> down to subconfigures.
>
> - The subconfigures correctly read --with-gcc-version-trigger
> and record the right version number.
>
> - There's no change in the version numbers for installed paths.
>
> OK to install?
Fine by me.
Andrew.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-11-26 10:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-25 20:47 Richard Sandiford
2004-11-25 20:50 ` Remove config.if (patch 2/4 " Richard Sandiford
2004-12-02 20:08 ` Alexandre Oliva
2004-11-25 20:54 ` Add config/gxx-include-dir.m4 (patch 3/4 " Richard Sandiford
2004-12-02 20:08 ` Alexandre Oliva
2004-12-03 10:55 ` Richard Sandiford
2004-11-25 21:05 ` Factor configure-time gcc version checks (patch 1/4 " Zack Weinberg
2004-11-25 21:28 ` Joseph S. Myers
2004-11-26 21:48 ` Zack Weinberg
2004-11-26 9:06 ` Richard Sandiford
2004-11-26 10:37 ` Andrew Haley [this message]
2004-12-01 23:08 ` DJ Delorie
2004-12-02 11:22 ` Richard Sandiford
2004-12-02 14:15 ` Richard Sandiford
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=16807.1802.438507.501707@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com \
--to=aph@redhat.com \
--cc=binutils@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=java-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=rsandifo@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox