From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6787 invoked by alias); 12 Nov 2004 09:54:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 6657 invoked from network); 12 Nov 2004 09:54:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO farnswood.snap.net.nz) (202.124.108.60) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 12 Nov 2004 09:54:41 -0000 Received: by farnswood.snap.net.nz (Postfix, from userid 501) id 79634627EE; Fri, 12 Nov 2004 09:49:29 +0000 (GMT) From: Nick Roberts MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16788.34601.216336.108993@farnswood.snap.net.nz> Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 09:54:00 -0000 To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: MI handshaking X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg00262.txt.bz2 I've moved and can't pick up mail from uklinux anymore (see the MAINTAINERS file). > Hmm, it's async (or unprompted), has the hypothetical potential for multiple values, and leaves us wondering which of those values it choose: > *mi-handshake={version=mi2,stable=[mi2]} > it should also appear after the copyright. > Oh and testing ;-) > Nick, Alain, comments? mi-handshake={version="mi2",protocols=[{name="mi2"}]} ? Shouldn't this be output with ui_out_field_stream etc, rather than fprintf_unfiltered? That presumably imposes some syntax on the output. I have to say all this is a bit too hypothetical for me, at the moment. I don't have the resources to track different MI versions. My priority is just to get something working. If things pick up, I might be a bit picky later. Hopefully, by then, others will be involved. Nick