From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24564 invoked by alias); 6 Oct 2004 12:28:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 24546 invoked from network); 6 Oct 2004 12:28:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 6 Oct 2004 12:28:07 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i96CS7Xh029900 for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2004 08:28:07 -0400 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i96CS7r21999 for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2004 08:28:07 -0400 Received: from localhost.redhat.com (devserv.devel.redhat.com [172.16.58.1]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i96CS6pL026870 for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2004 08:28:06 -0400 Received: by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 469) id 8C68B1A467A; Wed, 6 Oct 2004 08:20:08 -0400 (EDT) From: Elena Zannoni MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16739.58104.488965.241196@localhost.redhat.com> Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2004 12:28:00 -0000 To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH]: SH 2a - Part 4: Begin using RETURN_VALUE In-Reply-To: <20041006090809.GE3744@cygbert.vinschen.de> References: <20040909124701.GA7927@cygbert.vinschen.de> <16738.43902.850632.187540@localhost.redhat.com> <20041006090809.GE3744@cygbert.vinschen.de> X-SW-Source: 2004-10/txt/msg00114.txt.bz2 Corinna Vinschen writes: > > Yes, that's apparently right. As I wrote, "I would love to...", because > time has gone a bit over that naming scheme and I think, changing the > names to reflect their usage in a more general way would help when reading > the code in future. > > Is it ok to rename them? Sure, send a patch.