From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17962 invoked by alias); 21 Jun 2004 10:49:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 17882 invoked from network); 21 Jun 2004 10:49:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com) (81.96.64.123) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 21 Jun 2004 10:49:10 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i5LAl6VL031052; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 11:47:16 +0100 Received: (from aph@localhost) by redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i5LAl5IP031048; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 11:47:05 +0100 From: Andrew Haley MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16598.48296.988483.399856@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com> Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 10:49:00 -0000 To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: Jeff Johnston , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, java@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [RFA]: Java Inferior Call Take 2 In-Reply-To: <20040619235857.GA18759@nevyn.them.org> References: <40A9264C.4060404@redhat.com> <20040617030603.GC23443@nevyn.them.org> <40D20494.2020608@redhat.com> <20040619235857.GA18759@nevyn.them.org> X-SW-Source: 2004-06/txt/msg00473.txt.bz2 Daniel Jacobowitz writes: > On Thu, Jun 17, 2004 at 04:52:36PM -0400, Jeff Johnston wrote: > > Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > >On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 04:53:32PM -0400, Jeff Johnston wrote: > > > > > >>This is the reworked java inferior call patch. My previous attempt tried > > >>to modify the gdb v3 abi code to handle missing debug information from > > >>gcj. After a couple of gcc patches from Andrew Haley, the gnu-v3-abi.c > > >>code doesn't require any tampering. > > >> > > >>I had to enhance dwarf2read.c to handle the java vtable name (which is > > >>vtable) and to modify C++-only code to handle java syntax for class names. > > >> > > >>I have included a test case. > > >> > > >>Ok to commit? > > > > > > > > >First of all, it doesn't work for me; I'm guessing that's because I > > >have gcj 3.3 installed. Are the GCC changes in any released version of > > >GCC yet, so that I can add appropriately versioned XFAILs? > > > > > > > I am using current gcc sources because Andrew Haley only recently added the > > fixes. It has to be post 3.4.0 which is the last release but prior to > > Andrew's patches. > > Are you actually using GCC HEAD? Gcj does not even emit debug info for > the local variable "x" in jprint.main using today's CVS. Alright, I'll have a look. Andrew.