From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6832 invoked by alias); 5 Jun 2004 15:58:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 6825 invoked from network); 5 Jun 2004 15:58:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO aragorn.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.23) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 5 Jun 2004 15:58:56 -0000 Received: from zaretski (pns03-196-13.inter.net.il [80.230.196.13]) by aragorn.inter.net.il (MOS 3.4.6-GR) with ESMTP id DAH33174; Sat, 5 Jun 2004 18:58:22 +0300 (IDT) Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2004 15:58:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: Andrew Cagney Message-Id: <1659-Sat05Jun2004185545+0300-eliz@gnu.org> CC: randolph@tausq.org, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <40C1CC51.1020706@gnu.org> (message from Andrew Cagney on Sat, 05 Jun 2004 09:36:17 -0400) Subject: Re: [patch/rfa] function descriptor handling for push_dummy_call Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20040604061024.GQ601@tausq.org> <40C0C30C.7020308@gnu.org> <1438-Sat05Jun2004131412+0300-eliz@gnu.org> <40C1CC51.1020706@gnu.org> X-SW-Source: 2004-06/txt/msg00101.txt.bz2 > Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2004 09:36:17 -0400 > From: Andrew Cagney > > > > However, the change seems to be a cosmetic one: it renames a single > > argument to push_dummy_call from `func_addr' to `function'. Why is > > that necessary? > > I think it is, the parameter is now a `struct value' function and not a > function's code address. The suggested change doesn't indicate that in any way.