From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12104 invoked by alias); 1 Jun 2004 16:08:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 12092 invoked from network); 1 Jun 2004 16:07:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (66.30.197.194) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 1 Jun 2004 16:07:59 -0000 Received: by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 469) id 1C9711A4498; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 12:00:56 -0400 (EDT) From: Elena Zannoni MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16572.43064.43519.774441@localhost.redhat.com> Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2004 16:08:00 -0000 To: Andrew Cagney Cc: Michael Snyder , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [HEADS-UP] gdb segfault In-Reply-To: <40A0272D.5080702@gnu.org> References: <409C5170.8040702@redhat.com> <40A0272D.5080702@gnu.org> X-SW-Source: 2004-06/txt/msg00015.txt.bz2 Andrew Cagney writes: > > Hey yo -- > > > > gdb is seg-faulting immediately whenever its run with --noasync. > > I have an old build from the beginning of March that doesn't > > do it (nor do even older ones), so it's probably a change > > from between then and now. > > > > It crashes in display_gdb_prompt, as called from > > tui_command_loop. Here's a backtrace. > > Sounds like it's time to delete --noasync .... > > I think so, yes.