From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1695 invoked by alias); 18 Feb 2004 00:54:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 1185 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2004 00:54:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (66.30.197.194) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 18 Feb 2004 00:54:21 -0000 Received: by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 469) id 141581A448A; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 19:50:01 -0500 (EST) From: Elena Zannoni MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16434.46776.988131.462153@localhost.redhat.com> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 00:54:00 -0000 To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [rfa] Add SYMBOL_SET_LINKAGE_NAME In-Reply-To: <20040218003227.GA11352@nevyn.them.org> References: <20040216212406.GC17141@nevyn.them.org> <20040218002329.GA11115@nevyn.them.org> <16434.45185.855584.104606@localhost.redhat.com> <20040218003227.GA11352@nevyn.them.org> X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg00495.txt.bz2 Daniel Jacobowitz writes: > I know. You haven't asked anything about the patch, which you haven't > reviewed yet, which is fine. It's only a day old. The discussion > about interfaces is on a tangent thread about my future intentions. > What patch? One doesn't work. Another also is in HPread and we need to test that as well (I'll ask Michael about it). The third one you checked in. Are there others. > But there's no point in just continuing the cleanups now that I've > stirred up this much annoyed discussion asking for interface > descriptions. So I'll write the interface description and come back > later. > Please, now it's the perfect time to discuss what you think would be a good approach, before you get too deep into a design/solution. Nobody is saying that your idea is bogus, it's just hard to grasp it at this stage.