From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3191 invoked by alias); 16 Feb 2004 21:53:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 3153 invoked from network); 16 Feb 2004 21:53:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (66.30.197.194) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 16 Feb 2004 21:53:08 -0000 Received: by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 469) id 404321A448A; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 16:48:57 -0500 (EST) From: Elena Zannoni MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16433.15049.172030.577544@localhost.redhat.com> Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 21:53:00 -0000 To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [rfa] Add SYMBOL_SET_LINKAGE_NAME In-Reply-To: <20040216212406.GC17141@nevyn.them.org> References: <20040216212406.GC17141@nevyn.them.org> X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg00444.txt.bz2 Daniel Jacobowitz writes: > After this patch and my others from today there are no direct > assignments to the symbol name. In addition to the cleanup value, I'm > testing an approach which would change the storage of symbol names, > which prompted me to do this. can you elaborate on where you are going?