From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16211 invoked by alias); 10 Feb 2004 20:06:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 16187 invoked from network); 10 Feb 2004 20:06:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (66.30.197.194) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 10 Feb 2004 20:06:37 -0000 Received: by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 469) id DBA981A4484; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 15:02:58 -0500 (EST) From: Elena Zannoni MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16425.14578.813770.603105@localhost.redhat.com> Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 20:06:00 -0000 To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA/doco] add obstacks to gdbint.texi In-Reply-To: <20040210193015.GA7841@nevyn.them.org> References: <16425.5280.824503.7068@localhost.redhat.com> <20040210193015.GA7841@nevyn.them.org> X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg00256.txt.bz2 Daniel Jacobowitz writes: > Thanks for doing this! > > On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 12:28:00PM -0500, Elena Zannoni wrote: > > +@value{GDBN} uses various features provided by the libiberty library, > > +for instance the memory management functions xfree and xmalloc, and > > +the obstack extension. > > Actually, we don't use xfree and xmalloc from libiberty; we use our own > copy in utils.c that behave similarly. > duh, true. libiberty doesn't even have xfree. So what do we use from libiberty? demangler, floatformat, obstack, getopt, what else? elena > -- > Daniel Jacobowitz > MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer