From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28004 invoked by alias); 28 Jan 2004 17:11:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 27981 invoked from network); 28 Jan 2004 17:11:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (66.30.197.194) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 28 Jan 2004 17:11:42 -0000 Received: by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 469) id 05C481A440D; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 12:09:03 -0500 (EST) From: Elena Zannoni MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16407.60591.940653.467018@localhost.redhat.com> Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 17:11:00 -0000 To: David Carlton Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, Elena Zannoni , Daniel Jacobowitz Subject: Re: [rfa] classes, partial symtabs, and DW_AT_specification In-Reply-To: References: X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg00721.txt.bz2 David Carlton writes: > > Tested on i686-pc-linux-gnu, DWARF-2, 4 different GCC variants; no > regressions, and on GCC 3.4 two tests in rtti.exp went from {K}FAIL to > PASS. Is there an associated bug number that should be mentioned in the changelog? > > OK to commit? I guess I need symtab approval, though Daniel should > feel free to chime in as well. :-) And at some point we really need to > develop a plan of attack for DWARF-2 partial symbols - what > improvements can we do without GCC's help, what help do we want from > GCC? > Sure. Commit away. elena