From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1166 invoked by alias); 23 Jan 2004 21:27:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 1099 invoked from network); 23 Jan 2004 21:27:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nick.uklinux.net) (194.247.50.38) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 23 Jan 2004 21:27:23 -0000 Received: by nick.uklinux.net (Postfix, from userid 501) id 10F3075FDE; Fri, 23 Jan 2004 21:19:04 +0000 (GMT) From: Nick Roberts Message-ID: <16401.36808.499412.201798@nick.uklinux.net> Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 21:27:00 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: {commit: gdb/mi] -stack-list-locals and -var-list-children In-Reply-To: <20040123170509.GA31156@nevyn.them.org> References: <16396.33276.280356.511030@nick.uklinux.net> <20040120054932.GB23548@nevyn.them.org> <20040123170509.GA31156@nevyn.them.org> X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg00632.txt.bz2 > Note that the varobj is out of date. If my test is moved after Test: c_variable-5.8 does that work? Assuming the answer is yes, does this count as an obvious fix or does it need approval? Nick