From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23473 invoked by alias); 15 Jan 2004 03:15:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 23465 invoked from network); 15 Jan 2004 03:15:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp02.sohu.com) (61.135.132.105) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 15 Jan 2004 03:15:25 -0000 Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [218.242.139.224]) by smtp02.sohu.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88E1587B63 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 11:15:03 +0800 (CST) From: r6144 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16390.1462.203353.461105@localhost.localdomain> Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 03:15:00 -0000 To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH][newbie] Make gdb accept -feliminate-dwarf2-dups stuff In-Reply-To: <20040114150704.GA4517@nevyn.them.org> References: <16389.22843.352984.894253@localhost.localdomain> <20040114150704.GA4517@nevyn.them.org> X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg00384.txt.bz2 Daniel Jacobowitz writes: > Thanks. Unfortunately, we can't fix up and include the patch unless > you file a copyright assignment with the FSF. You can do that, or wait > - a whole lot of people have needed this feature lately, and if no one > with an assignment beats me to it I'll probably do it myself this > month. I skimmed your patch and it looks like you're doing it rather > differently than I planned to. Mmm. What a hassle, especially for a young Chinese student who have hardly seen any international snail mails before. That's partly a reason when I say I didn't expect the patch to be included. It is so unlucky that safety and convenience don't go together, and that those who actually have an assignment are all so busy... Anyway, I have sent a request for the copyright assignment form, but I'm not really confident that I can complete this formidable (for me) task. Thank for your kind reply, though. > > > +#include > > Neat, I hadn't seen this before... It would be great if someday application software such as gcc and gdb can use Glib... but maybe Glib isn't *that* portable, yet. > > -- > Daniel Jacobowitz > MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer