From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6031 invoked by alias); 13 Jan 2004 17:18:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 6016 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2004 17:18:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (66.30.197.194) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 13 Jan 2004 17:18:41 -0000 Received: by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 469) id 2F0691A440D; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:17:10 -0500 (EST) From: Elena Zannoni MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16388.10262.104280.716130@localhost.redhat.com> Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 17:18:00 -0000 To: mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain) Cc: ezannoni@redhat.com, drow@mvista.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] new test for separate debug info In-Reply-To: <20040113051858.8BD6B4ACDA@berman.michael-chastain.com> References: <20040113051858.8BD6B4ACDA@berman.michael-chastain.com> X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg00347.txt.bz2 Michael Elizabeth Chastain writes: > Okay, I just ran it on spe191.testdrive.hp.com to see what happens. > What happens is: > > (gdb) info source > Current source file is /house/chastain/gdb/s1/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/sepdebug.c > Located in /house/chastain/gdb/s1/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/sepdebug.c > Contains 150 lines. > Source language is c. > Compiled with unknown debugging format. aarrrgh > Does not include preprocessor macro info. > (gdb) UNSUPPORTED: gdb.base/sepdebug.exp: no separate debug info handling > testcase /house/chastain/gdb/s1/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/sepdebug.exp completed in 0 seconds > > This is with HP Ansi C B.11.11.28707.GP. > > I'm happy with this outcome, although I am not happy that "info source" > prints "compiled with unknown debugging format". I will investigate and > file a PR. > > Also, the message does not happen because of "unknown debugging format". > It happens because I don't have gnu binutils in my $PATH, and the HP-UX > strip barfs on "--strip-debug". Maybe the two unsupported messages should differ a bit more from each other: "cannot produce separate debug info file" instead? > > I haven't set up a test bed for gcc + binutils on this platform yet, > just the native tools. I did try GNU strip from binutils 2.14 on > a hello-world program with "strip --strip-debug hello" and it didn't > complain. > OK, when you do let me know what other marvellous ways the test fails. elena