From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19709 invoked by alias); 13 Jan 2004 04:49:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 19702 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2004 04:49:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (66.30.197.194) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 13 Jan 2004 04:49:06 -0000 Received: by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 469) id 10F0A1A440D; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 23:47:35 -0500 (EST) From: Elena Zannoni MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16387.30822.652006.678459@localhost.redhat.com> Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 04:49:00 -0000 To: mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain) Cc: drow@mvista.com, ezannoni@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] new test for separate debug info In-Reply-To: <20040113022801.CC50E4ACDA@berman.michael-chastain.com> References: <20040113022801.CC50E4ACDA@berman.michael-chastain.com> X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg00336.txt.bz2 Michael Elizabeth Chastain writes: > > Hmm, maybe. That's an easy fix, if needed. Does binutils deal with som? > > I don't know. But I like Daniel's idea; make it "dwarf-2 only". > In the place where you comment that stabs+ does not work, you > can comment that SOM has not even been tried. > > Michael C Just curious, but I'd like to see what happens on HPUX first. The test deals with the case in which strip and objcopy themselves fail as well. The case for stabs was that objcopy/strip was working w/o errors or warnings but the result was corrupted. Maybe here they'll just die. elena