From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28042 invoked by alias); 7 Nov 2003 23:55:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 28032 invoked from network); 7 Nov 2003 23:55:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO palrel11.hp.com) (156.153.255.246) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 7 Nov 2003 23:55:12 -0000 Received: from hplms2.hpl.hp.com (hplms2.hpl.hp.com [15.0.152.33]) by palrel11.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B1B01C004D8; Fri, 7 Nov 2003 15:55:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from napali.hpl.hp.com (napali.hpl.hp.com [15.4.89.123]) by hplms2.hpl.hp.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/HPL-PA Hub) with ESMTP id hA7NtBCT016118; Fri, 7 Nov 2003 15:55:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from napali.hpl.hp.com (napali [127.0.0.1]) by napali.hpl.hp.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) with ESMTP id hA7NtBFO022125; Fri, 7 Nov 2003 15:55:11 -0800 Received: (from davidm@localhost) by napali.hpl.hp.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) id hA7Nt3Nj022121; Fri, 7 Nov 2003 15:55:03 -0800 From: David Mosberger MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16300.12503.585501.180768@napali.hpl.hp.com> Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2003 23:55:00 -0000 To: Andrew Cagney Cc: davidm@hpl.hp.com, "J. Johnston" , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, Kevin Buettner Subject: Re: RFA: ia64 portion of libunwind patch In-Reply-To: <3FAC2D03.8070607@redhat.com> References: <3FA2B71A.3080905@redhat.com> <3FA2CA1B.7000502@redhat.com> <16290.59502.799536.383397@napali.hpl.hp.com> <3FAC12D3.2070207@redhat.com> <16300.8192.489647.740612@napali.hpl.hp.com> <3FAC2454.2030009@redhat.com> <16300.9949.513264.716812@napali.hpl.hp.com> <3FAC2D03.8070607@redhat.com> Reply-To: davidm@hpl.hp.com X-URL: http://www.hpl.hp.com/personal/David_Mosberger/ X-SW-Source: 2003-11/txt/msg00144.txt.bz2 >>>>> On Fri, 07 Nov 2003 18:38:43 -0500, Andrew Cagney said: Andrew> Draging that entire buffer (128k in the case of a program Andrew> like GDB) across the remote link is going to raise a few Andrew> eyebrows so a careful examination is justified. Oh. Can you remind me why gdb wouldn't be grabbing the unwind table from the ELF binary instead? You don't drag the debug info over the remote link either, right? --david