From: Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com>
To: "Kris Warkentin" <kewarken@qnx.com>
Cc: "Michael Elizabeth Chastain" <mec@shout.net>, <drow@mvista.com>,
<gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] New testcase for PR:1291
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 16:02:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <16286.37627.229387.242404@localhost.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0b2801c39cbb$056701c0$0202040a@catdog>
Kris Warkentin writes:
> > > A) move it and make it generic.
> > > B) leave it and write it in assembly.
> >
> > I like (B) better. The backtrace code is all about specific
> > assembly instructions. So I'd like it better in the style of the i386
> > prologue tests, with explicit assembly.
> >
> > Michael C
>
> Okay so this bit of assembly adequately demonstrates the problem. There is
> a bit of an issue here though that perhaps some sh4 expert can clear up for
> me. If I run this and go "until sub2", it stops on sub2 and works fine.
> If, however, I go "until sub1", followed by "until sub2", it stops a couple
> instructions before sub2 and I have to 'si' into it. I can modify the test
> case to not bother checking sub1 (since we know it's okay anyway) but I'm
> still puzzled as to why this is having the problem.
>
> cheers,
>
> Kris
>
Ok. Not sure why that happens. It defeinitely seems like a bug. File
a pr, and KFAIL it in the testsuite, with the pr number.
elena
>
> void sub1 (void);
> void sub2 (void);
>
> main()
> {
> sub1();
> sub2();
> }
>
> asm(".text\n"
> " .align 5\n"
> "sub1:\n"
> " mov.l r14,@-r15\n"
> " add #-128,r15\n"
> " add #-128,r15\n"
> " mov r15,r14\n"
> " mov.w .STACK1,r7\n"
> " add r7,r14\n"
> " mov r14,r15\n"
> " mov.l @r15+,r14\n"
> " rts\n"
> " nop\n"
> " .align 1\n"
> ".STACK1:\n"
> " .short 256\n");
>
> asm(".text\n"
> " .align 5\n"
> "sub2:\n"
> " mov.l r14,@-r15\n"
> " mov.w .STACK2,r3\n"
> " sub r3,r15\n"
> " mov r15,r14\n"
> " mov.w .STACK2,r7\n"
> " add r7,r14\n"
> " mov r14,r15\n"
> " mov.l @r15+,r14\n"
> " rts\n"
> " nop\n"
> " .align 1\n"
> ".STACK2:\n"
> " .short 260\n");
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-28 16:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-24 19:23 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-10-27 19:01 ` Kris Warkentin
2003-10-28 16:02 ` Elena Zannoni [this message]
2003-10-28 16:46 ` Kris Warkentin
2003-10-28 16:49 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-10-24 19:20 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-10-24 15:40 Kris Warkentin
2003-10-24 15:59 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-10-24 17:46 ` Kris Warkentin
2003-10-24 17:59 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-10-24 16:01 ` Elena Zannoni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=16286.37627.229387.242404@localhost.redhat.com \
--to=ezannoni@redhat.com \
--cc=drow@mvista.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=kewarken@qnx.com \
--cc=mec@shout.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox