From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8476 invoked by alias); 3 Oct 2003 22:19:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 8469 invoked from network); 3 Oct 2003 22:19:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 3 Oct 2003 22:19:54 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h93MJr126720 for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2003 18:19:53 -0400 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h93MJrc18740 for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2003 18:19:53 -0400 Received: from localhost.redhat.com (devserv.devel.redhat.com [172.16.58.1]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h93MJqbe012472; Fri, 3 Oct 2003 18:19:52 -0400 Received: by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 469) id 884B92CCAA; Fri, 3 Oct 2003 18:30:12 -0400 (EDT) From: Elena Zannoni MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16253.63603.893757.250193@localhost.redhat.com> Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2003 22:19:00 -0000 To: Jim Blandy Cc: Roland McGrath , Mark Kettenis , Kevin Buettner , Daniel Jacobowitz , Andreas Schwab , Scott Bambrough , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] add-symbol-file-from-memory command In-Reply-To: References: <200310030427.h934REdK018487@magilla.sf.frob.com> X-SW-Source: 2003-10/txt/msg00064.txt.bz2 Jim Blandy writes: > > Roland McGrath writes: > > I posted this originally back in May, and got no response whatsoever. I've > > updated the patch to work with current mainline gdb and tested it again. I > > hope there will be some response this time. This new user command is not > > important, but this code needs review as it will form part of the support > > for backtraces from system calls to work on Linux 2.6 kernels. > > This is important thing to get right; I'm sorry it wasn't reviewed > promptly back in May. > The reason being that there was no agreement on the prerequisites, i.e. how to "do it right". There was no decision yet from the kernel people either. See also the binutils discussion about the bfd function. elena