From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24004 invoked by alias); 24 Sep 2003 18:12:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 5455 invoked from network); 24 Sep 2003 13:49:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 24 Sep 2003 13:49:19 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h8ODnI110708 for ; Wed, 24 Sep 2003 09:49:18 -0400 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h8ODnHc28726 for ; Wed, 24 Sep 2003 09:49:17 -0400 Received: from localhost.redhat.com (devserv.devel.redhat.com [172.16.58.1]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h8ODnHeX023787 for ; Wed, 24 Sep 2003 09:49:17 -0400 Received: by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 469) id 6AC782CC8D; Wed, 24 Sep 2003 09:58:57 -0400 (EDT) From: Elena Zannoni MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16241.41760.618153.403270@localhost.redhat.com> Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 18:12:00 -0000 To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: SH patch 2 (was Re: [RFA] SH: Deprecate deprecated functions, use new frame interface) In-Reply-To: <20030924084311.GF9981@cygbert.vinschen.de> References: <20030908165510.GK1859@cygbert.vinschen.de> <16226.1322.230352.450541@localhost.redhat.com> <20030915160111.GA9283@cygbert.vinschen.de> <16231.17730.828347.741094@localhost.redhat.com> <20030916172606.GU9981@cygbert.vinschen.de> <20030916173038.GA25459@nevyn.them.org> <20030922143254.GR9981@cygbert.vinschen.de> <20030922144405.GA20343@nevyn.them.org> <20030922150831.GA17905@cygbert.vinschen.de> <16240.44135.87461.106684@localhost.redhat.com> <20030924084311.GF9981@cygbert.vinschen.de> X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg00533.txt.bz2 Corinna Vinschen writes: > On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 04:26:15PM -0400, Elena Zannoni wrote: > > Corinna Vinschen writes: > > > I don't think that's necessary. The results with dwarf2 unwinding are > > > 1 FAIL less than without dwarf2 unwinding. Removing the dwarf2 > > > unwinding might result in forgetting it. Keeping it in will remind us > > > that the dwarf2 unwinder still needs a bit of work. > > > > I think so too. But I'd like to see if something can be done for SH > > similar to the i386_convert_register_p method. > > Is that necessary before the patch gets approval or could that be added > in a follow up step? After, yes. elena > > Corinna > > -- > Corinna Vinschen > Cygwin Developer > Red Hat, Inc.