From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24110 invoked by alias); 9 Sep 2003 10:30:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 24098 invoked from network); 9 Sep 2003 10:30:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO igw2.watson.ibm.com) (129.34.20.6) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 9 Sep 2003 10:30:39 -0000 Received: from sp1n293en1.watson.ibm.com (sp1n293en1.watson.ibm.com [9.2.112.57]) by igw2.watson.ibm.com (8.11.7/8.11.4) with ESMTP id h89ARf789864; Tue, 9 Sep 2003 06:27:41 -0400 Received: from kitch0.watson.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sp1n293en1.watson.ibm.com (8.11.7/8.11.7) with ESMTP id h89AUWu09372; Tue, 9 Sep 2003 06:30:32 -0400 Received: (from jimix@localhost) by kitch0.watson.ibm.com (AIX4.3/8.9.3p2/8.9.3/09-18-2002) id GAA51990; Tue, 9 Sep 2003 06:30:31 -0400 From: Jimi Xenidis MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16221.43974.370821.467790@kitch0.watson.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2003 10:30:00 -0000 To: Kevin Buettner Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, Andrew Cagney Subject: Re: Patch to eliminate SOFTWARE_SINGLE_STEP from ppc Was: Powerpc and software single step In-Reply-To: <1030908220107.ZM6208@localhost.localdomain> References: <3F4398EC.2050405@redhat.com> <16195.39851.78762.619597@kitch0.watson.ibm.com> <3F4440F0.30007@redhat.com> <16198.6133.411978.563514@kitch0.watson.ibm.com> <3F463CA9.5000900@redhat.com> <16198.21410.308896.588372@kitch0.watson.ibm.com> <3F465EFD.9020700@redhat.com> <16220.53590.956496.102996@kitch0.watson.ibm.com> <20030908190016.GB24747@nevyn.them.org> <16220.58287.637563.556990@kitch0.watson.ibm.com> <20030908202005.GA30286@nevyn.them.org> <16220.62220.290008.652878@kitch0.watson.ibm.com> <1030908220107.ZM6208@localhost.localdomain> X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg00153.txt.bz2 >>>>> "KB" == Kevin Buettner writes: KB> On Sep 8, 5:22pm, Jimi Xenidis wrote: >> >> I agree with you and am equally puzzled, but it does not, I expected >> to wrap it in: >> if (info->osabi != GDB_OSABI_LINUX) >> but it was not necessary. >> Actually wanted == GDB_OSABI_AIX but there was no such animal. KB> Would you mind doing some tracing to figure out why wrapping it KB> with a test for AIX wasn't necessary? The fact that you didn't KB> need a test suggests that there's a bug somewhere else... sure. -JX