Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com>
To: David Ayers <d.ayers@inode.at>
Cc: Adam Fedor <fedor@doc.com>,
	"gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com" <gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC]: Better ObjC symbol skipping in decode_line_1
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2003 18:43:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <16220.53209.420727.819654@localhost.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3F5C882D.4010208@inode.at>

David Ayers writes:
 > Adam Fedor wrote:
 > 
 > >This patch fixes a problem with ObjC symbols not being properly skipped
 > >over during decode_line_1 processing. ObjC symbols can have spaces and
 > >parenthesis in them, so they need special handling, otherwise you get
 > >odd warnings like:
 > >
 > >Error in re-setting breakpoint 2:
 > >Function "-[NSObject(NEXTSTEP)" not defined.
 > >
 > >or
 > >
 > >Error in re-setting breakpoint 2:
 > >Function "" not defined.
 > >
 > >
 > >
 > >  
 > >
 > >------------------------------------------------------------------------
 > >
 > >2003-07-31  Adam Fedor  <fedor@gnu.org>
 > >
 > >	* gdb/linespec.c (is_objc_method_format): New function
 > >	(decode_line_1, locate_first_half): Use it.
 > >  
 > >
 > I know Adam has asked this before, but I'm unsure if there was a 
 > definite reply, so let me reiterate...
 > 
 > Can this patch go into 6.0? (Please... :-) )
 > 
 > It really makes ObjC support look much better on its debut, and as 
 > Michael Chastain already mentioned, it has been on mainline for quite 
 > some time now working beautifully.
 > 
 > Cheers,
 > David Ayers
 > 


I don't think it would do any harm on gdb-6. So it could go in, if
changes are still allowed.

elena


  reply	other threads:[~2003-09-08 18:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-07-31 15:05 Adam Fedor
2003-07-31 16:32 ` Elena Zannoni
2003-09-08 13:46 ` David Ayers
2003-09-08 18:43   ` Elena Zannoni [this message]
2003-09-08 18:58     ` Andrew Cagney
2003-09-09  3:58       ` Adam Fedor

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=16220.53209.420727.819654@localhost.redhat.com \
    --to=ezannoni@redhat.com \
    --cc=d.ayers@inode.at \
    --cc=fedor@doc.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox