From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 82479 invoked by alias); 4 Sep 2017 13:27:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 81484 invoked by uid 89); 4 Sep 2017 13:27:07 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=H*M:ralph X-HELO: mail.baldwin.cx Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (HELO mail.baldwin.cx) (96.47.65.170) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Sep 2017 13:27:01 +0000 Received: from ralph.baldwin.cx (c-73-231-226-104.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [73.231.226.104]) by mail.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9068910AF07; Mon, 4 Sep 2017 09:26:58 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, coypu@sdf.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Various build fixes for NetBSD Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2017 13:27:00 -0000 Message-ID: <1618758.R810WcpHCu@ralph.baldwin.cx> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (FreeBSD/11.1-STABLE; KDE/4.14.30; amd64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <4e0601ae-32eb-9e6a-1a64-df588e58a2c2@redhat.com> References: <20170725165051.9132-1-jhb@FreeBSD.org> <4e0601ae-32eb-9e6a-1a64-df588e58a2c2@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-09/txt/msg00044.txt.bz2 On Monday, September 04, 2017 01:50:37 PM Pedro Alves wrote: > On 07/25/2017 05:50 PM, John Baldwin wrote: > > Relative to the first patch series: one patch has been committed, > > the amd64 KVM support has been dropped, the _KMEMUSER #define was > > moved earlier in bsd-kvm.o, and the x86 debug registers change was > > expanded to also add needed object files in the NetBSD/x86 native > > targets. I haven't been able to test remaining patches so am > > waiting for testing reports from coypu@. > > > > This hasn't been pushed yet, right? > FWIW, it looks good to me. I have just been waiting for coypu@ to verify that they tested out ok. -- John Baldwin