Re: RFA (?) Annotate Level 3 patch

Andrew Cagney
2004-02-10T23:40:35Z

> > Can you post a log with/with-out this patch to illustrate what's
> > happening. You're right - emacs should see "stopped" first but there
> > might be a better long-term way to do this.
> >
> > I suspect this will mean playing with the print-stop-reason code.
>
> Moving annotate_stopped to the start of normal_stop seems to do the right
> thing. It might be bad practice, however, to break existing functionality so a
> better solution might be to create a new annotation there - aargh! - called
> stopping, say, instead. However, remember that I will have reduced my initial
> set of 25 annotations to 14. They would be:
>
>
> pre-prompt prompt post-prompt
> commands overload-choice query
> prompt-for-continue source starting
> exited signalled signal
> stopped
>
> and stopping

Could stopped be zapped from annotate level-3 then?

Andrew