From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20355 invoked by alias); 29 Jul 2003 21:46:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 20348 invoked from network); 29 Jul 2003 21:46:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 29 Jul 2003 21:46:56 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h6TLkuZ21259 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 17:46:56 -0400 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h6TLkuI04823; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 17:46:56 -0400 Received: from localhost.redhat.com (romulus-int.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.46]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h6TLksL04033; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 17:46:55 -0400 Received: by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 469) id D4DD22CB2D; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 17:54:24 -0400 (EDT) From: Elena Zannoni MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16166.60688.682284.636713@localhost.redhat.com> Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 21:46:00 -0000 To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Cc: ezannoni@redhat.com, msnyder@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] testsuite cleanups (part 2) In-Reply-To: <200307292135.h6TLZqNs017920@duracef.shout.net> References: <200307292135.h6TLZqNs017920@duracef.shout.net> X-SW-Source: 2003-07/txt/msg00531.txt.bz2 Michael Elizabeth Chastain writes: > eza> [PS. I assume I used the correct autoconf, but I am nost sure: I used the > eza> autoconf-000227 snapshot]. > > ms> In view of the large diffs in configure, I suspect this is indeed the > ms> wrong version of autoconf. The rest of the change is approved. If you > ms> don't easily solve the autoconf issue, you might consider leaving > ms> configure alone -- it's just an extra test... > > A little sniffing indicates that the last commit to 'configure.in' > used autoconf 2.13 to generate 'configure'. That's where the diff > is coming from. I think that 000227 also brands itself as 2.13. I think this may be where the confusion comes from, the configure file tells you "configure generated by autoconf version 2.13" in both cases. > > So either the blessed version has changed, or the last commit to > 'configure.in' was done with the wrong autoconf. > > I agree it might be useful to split the patch, if we can't get a > quick resolution to "which autoconf is blessed". > Ok, this issue seems to be resolved now. Let me know when I can commit, or not :-). > Michael C elena