From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11761 invoked by alias); 10 Jul 2003 22:59:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 11751 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2003 22:59:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (66.30.197.194) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 10 Jul 2003 22:59:45 -0000 Received: by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 469) id 905DB2CA3A; Thu, 10 Jul 2003 19:06:47 -0400 (EDT) From: Elena Zannoni MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16141.61831.333692.40493@localhost.redhat.com> Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 22:59:00 -0000 To: Richard Henderson Cc: Elena Zannoni , Mark Kettenis , gdb-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [RFA] Don't SEGV on invalid dwarf2 frame info In-Reply-To: <20030710224421.GB20109@twiddle.net> References: <20030710010318.GA3645@twiddle.net> <86wueqp075.fsf@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> <16141.55923.596252.107277@localhost.redhat.com> <20030710224421.GB20109@twiddle.net> X-SW-Source: 2003-07/txt/msg00226.txt.bz2 Richard Henderson writes: > On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 05:28:19PM -0400, Elena Zannoni wrote: > > As is, the patch doesn't compile. > > Eh? Certainly it did. > there was an include missing, and I was getting a few warnings from the lack of a prototype. > > I also think that there should be a check after reading the > > initial_length, that such length is within the section. > > Oops. That got lost during a code rearrangement. > I should put it back in... > It's in the version I posted. elena > > r~