From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23382 invoked by alias); 26 Jun 2003 12:49:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 23373 invoked from network); 26 Jun 2003 12:49:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cygnus.equallogic.com) (65.170.102.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 26 Jun 2003 12:49:48 -0000 Received: from cygnus.equallogic.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by cygnus.equallogic.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h5QCnmt04013 for ; Thu, 26 Jun 2003 08:49:48 -0400 Received: from deneb.dev.equallogic.com (deneb.dev.equallogic.com [172.16.1.99]) by cygnus.equallogic.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h5QCnli03998; Thu, 26 Jun 2003 08:49:47 -0400 Received: from pkoning.dev.equallogic.com.equallogic.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by deneb.dev.equallogic.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h5QCnkg09530; Thu, 26 Jun 2003 08:49:47 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16122.60395.709154.279439@pkoning.dev.equallogic.com> Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 12:49:00 -0000 From: Paul Koning To: drow@mvista.com Cc: ac131313@redhat.com, mec@shout.net, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [rfa] PROBLEMS: document 'constructor breakpoint ignored' bug References: <200306242026.h5OKQThr012996@duracef.shout.net> <3EFA0DE4.4070009@redhat.com> <20030625230448.GA1600@nevyn.them.org> X-SW-Source: 2003-06/txt/msg00788.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Jacobowitz writes: Daniel> Sure, since it's not going to be fixed in time. Go for it. As a workaround, I patched my local copy of gdb to use the "verbose" demangler mode, so the various flavors of constructors/destructors DO have different names. They are *weird* names, but at least you can refer to their entry points by name that way. It's a trivial patch. It changes the way constructors are named in gdb, but that doesn't seem to be a big deal if it changes them from conventionally named but unuseable things into strangely named but useable... Interested in that approach, as a stopgap -- rather than document the restriction? paul