From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1208 invoked by alias); 15 May 2003 20:21:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 1158 invoked from network); 15 May 2003 20:21:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 15 May 2003 20:21:20 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h4FKLKH13351 for ; Thu, 15 May 2003 16:21:20 -0400 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h4FKLKI11102; Thu, 15 May 2003 16:21:20 -0400 Received: from localhost.redhat.com (IDENT:BmYWHLm4/QMaWHAxNFWAQ0E4qfsHzOaf@tooth.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.29]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h4FKLJQ24473; Thu, 15 May 2003 16:21:20 -0400 Received: by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 469) id 63E9E2C951; Thu, 15 May 2003 16:26:36 -0400 (EDT) From: Elena Zannoni MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16067.63484.227726.17985@localhost.redhat.com> Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 20:21:00 -0000 To: David Carlton Cc: Andrew Cagney , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [rfa] Inline/eliminate DEPRECATED_SYMBOL_MATCHES_NAME In-Reply-To: References: <3EC3DAC9.3080302@redhat.com> X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00254.txt.bz2 David Carlton writes: > On Thu, 15 May 2003 14:22:01 -0400, Andrew Cagney said: > > > This patch replaces the only remaining reference to > > DEPRECATED_SYMBOL_MATCHES_NAME with it's contents (which also contains > > a reference to a deprecated macro). > > I can't approve it, but it's fine with me - I would actually even say > that it qualifies as obvious if Elena or Jim doesn't say otherwise in > the next few days. The only reason why I hadn't done this earlier is > that lookup_minimal_symbol could potentially use some other cleanups, > which this would naturally be part of, but given that I haven't gotten > around to posting an RF{A,C} for that, deleting the macro now makes > sense. > > David Carlton > carlton@math.stanford.edu yes, fine with me. thanks elena