From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10397 invoked by alias); 12 May 2003 20:16:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 10249 invoked from network); 12 May 2003 20:16:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 12 May 2003 20:16:05 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h4CKG4H04257 for ; Mon, 12 May 2003 16:16:04 -0400 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h4CKG4I14339 for ; Mon, 12 May 2003 16:16:04 -0400 Received: from localhost.redhat.com (IDENT:0iGG6vYxPRfGiPx6Sbe6v//Mua5KDvyj@tooth.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.29]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h4CKG3A30021; Mon, 12 May 2003 16:16:03 -0400 Received: by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 469) id E184B2C950; Mon, 12 May 2003 16:21:07 -0400 (EDT) From: Elena Zannoni MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16064.563.597627.733937@localhost.redhat.com> Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 20:16:00 -0000 To: David Carlton Cc: Elena Zannoni , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] Rename *_NAMESPACE enum In-Reply-To: References: <16063.60175.389541.259178@localhost.redhat.com> X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00192.txt.bz2 David Carlton writes: > On Mon, 12 May 2003 14:42:23 -0400, Elena Zannoni said: > > > While looking at David's namespace patches I kept getting entangled in > > the gdb's notion of namespace (the enum_namespace) and the c++ > > namespaces. Especially now, that some functions have both an > > enum_namespace parameter and a cp_namespace parameter type, it is > > becoming hard to keep in mind what parameter is what. > > > So I renamed the whole lot to > > enum_domain and *_DOMAIN. > > You are my hero. :-) I would have proposed something like this except > that I couldn't think of any good terminology; if you like domain, I > certainly won't complain. > I don't particularly like it either, but it seems the lesser of two evils. I also couldn't come up with anything better. I also don't particularly want to re-edit all those files :-) elena > David Carlton > carlton@math.stanford.edu