From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30207 invoked by alias); 16 Apr 2003 01:22:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 30200 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2003 01:22:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 16 Apr 2003 01:22:29 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h3G1MTD25697 for ; Tue, 15 Apr 2003 21:22:29 -0400 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h3G1MSq14670 for ; Tue, 15 Apr 2003 21:22:28 -0400 Received: from localhost.redhat.com (romulus-int.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.46]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h3G1MRg16023; Tue, 15 Apr 2003 21:22:27 -0400 Received: by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 469) id B071C2C441; Tue, 15 Apr 2003 21:26:54 -0400 (EDT) From: Elena Zannoni MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16028.45406.520356.521171@localhost.redhat.com> Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 01:22:00 -0000 To: David Carlton Cc: Elena Zannoni , Daniel Jacobowitz , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, Jim Blandy Subject: Re: [rfa] annotate blocks with C++ namespace information In-Reply-To: References: <20030311171133.GA3362@nevyn.them.org> <16027.2953.467195.516437@localhost.redhat.com> <20030415020820.GB30534@nevyn.them.org> <16027.28339.641147.70506@localhost.redhat.com> X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg00315.txt.bz2 David Carlton writes: > On Mon, 14 Apr 2003 22:30:11 -0400, Elena Zannoni said: > > > I see it more as building language specific structures, and letting > > symtabs have a pointer to those. I think the cp-namespace.c idea is a > > good compromise. > > Excellent! Here's what I've committed: it's the same as before, > except that a lot of what was added to buildsym.c is in > cp-namespace.c, as is a lot of what was added to cp-support.c. No > substantial changes otherwise. nice, thanks! > > If I could get a final decision on the fate of > lookup_symbol_aux_minsyms, I'd appreciate it, because that will affect > the details of the next patch in this series. Which will probably > take me a little while to prepare, anyways: I'm fairly busy for the > rest of this week, so it might have to wait until next week. *blink* *blink*..ahhh.. totally forgot, sorry. I'll make it next. elena > > David Carlton > carlton@math.stanford.edu >