From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-23746-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 15360 invoked by alias); 8 Apr 2003 23:24:44 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 15353 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2003 23:24:44 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 8 Apr 2003 23:24:44 -0000
Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h38NOie29110
	for <gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>; Tue, 8 Apr 2003 19:24:44 -0400
Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156])
	by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h38NOiJ25492
	for <gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>; Tue, 8 Apr 2003 19:24:44 -0400
Received: from localhost.redhat.com (romulus-int.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.46])
	by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h38NOhm17498
	for <gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>; Tue, 8 Apr 2003 19:24:43 -0400
Received: by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 469)
	id 4AC6A2C43F; Tue,  8 Apr 2003 19:29:01 -0400 (EDT)
From: Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <16019.23357.144916.774165@localhost.redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2003 23:24:00 -0000
To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: [RFC/TESTSUITE]  completion.exp
X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg00147.txt.bz2


Another one (I am going through the some RedHat Linux gdb patches, in
case it wasn't obvious).  This one is fairly specific, I am not sure
if it would be Ok for inclusion in the general sources, but just in case.

Again this is for the '+' character in the directory name.

elena

        * gdb.base/completion.exp: When matching on the current directory,
        make sure that any '+' in the directory name gets escaped.


Index: completion.exp
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/uberbaum/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/completion.exp,v
retrieving revision 1.14
diff -u -p -r1.14 completion.exp
--- completion.exp	4 Jan 2003 22:37:49 -0000	1.14
+++ completion.exp	8 Apr 2003 23:18:00 -0000
@@ -669,7 +669,12 @@ cd ${srcdir}
 set fullsrcdir [pwd]
 cd ${mydir}
 
-gdb_test "cd ${fullsrcdir}" "Working directory ${fullsrcdir}.*" "cd to \${srcdir}"
+# If the directory name contains a '+' we must escape it, adding a backslash.
+# If not, the test below will fail because it will interpret the '+' as a 
+# regext operator.
+regsub -all \\+  ${fullsrcdir} \\\+ dirstring
+
+gdb_test "cd ${fullsrcdir}" "Working directory ${dirstring}.*" "cd to \${srcdir}"
 send_gdb "file ./gdb.base/compl\t"
 sleep 1
 gdb_expect  {