From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga05.intel.com (mga05.intel.com [192.55.52.43]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C3AA3973046 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 20:36:56 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 9C3AA3973046 IronPort-SDR: V2go8KuCHR7l3zKSKwb/xqMbrJmts3EAY1akQBbPp4IQ7gkTZyBoR3+5OwR94a5S0Pe8Fg/GAR c7ypbRvzgi/A== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9748"; a="244870291" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,274,1596524400"; d="scan'208";a="244870291" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga006.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.51]) by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 18 Sep 2020 13:36:50 -0700 IronPort-SDR: xU/XTymRR6n+zyvWfl7XKb1jzufXSiOf4qtVS2Oy9di4TMzYIoib0MpZRrb8BQBKmdWHT/C8km aovK63zIzrMQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,274,1596524400"; d="scan'208";a="308024091" Received: from irvmail001.ir.intel.com ([163.33.26.43]) by orsmga006.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 18 Sep 2020 13:36:49 -0700 Received: from ulvlx001.iul.intel.com (ulvlx001.iul.intel.com [172.28.207.17]) by irvmail001.ir.intel.com (8.14.3/8.13.6/MailSET/Hub) with ESMTP id 08IKannR030914; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 21:36:49 +0100 Received: from ulvlx001.iul.intel.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ulvlx001.iul.intel.com with ESMTP id 08IKanmr010279; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 22:36:49 +0200 Received: (from taktemur@localhost) by ulvlx001.iul.intel.com with LOCAL id 08IKamww010275; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 22:36:49 +0200 From: Tankut Baris Aktemur To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: [PING][PATCH v2 0/2] Breakpoint conditions at locations with differing contexts Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 22:36:42 +0200 Message-Id: <1600461402-10013-1-git-send-email-tankut.baris.aktemur@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.0.7 In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_NONE, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 20:36:58 -0000 > Hi, > > This is a follow-up of > > https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2020-July/170984.html > > which is a short series about conditional breakpoints where the > condition may be invalid at some breakpoint locations because of their > context. Currently, GDB does not allow defining a condition if it's > not valid at all locations. This series aims at bringing more > flexibility: the locations at which the condition expression is > invalid are disabled automatically. > > Patch 1/2 is the same as in v1. Patch 2/2 was previously an RFC. Andrew > Burgess commented on it at > > https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2020-August/171012.html > > In v2, I extend Patch 2/2 with the '-force-condition' flag for the break > command, add test cases and more documentation. It is no longer an RFC. Kindly pinging for https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2020-August/171387.html Thanks. Baris