Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Cc: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@ericsson.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove lwp -> pid conversion in linux_nat_xfer_partial
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 01:22:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <15f668b8e6bfe802bad5671738f7ef3b@polymtl.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cf900897-3e74-aa71-32b8-4f6c96e6a0a6@redhat.com>

On 2017-03-21 21:00, Pedro Alves wrote:
> Nope.  If you call "exit", then yes.  The kernel kills the whole thread
> group in response to that system call.  If the leader does
> pthread_exit, then no, the thread group stays around until all children
> exit too.  The kernel won't report the main thread's exit status (i.e.,
> we can't reap that zombie, and we'd hang if we tried a blocking 
> waitpid)
> until all the children are reaped first.  That's why we have
> linux-nat.c:check_zombie_leaders (and the equivalent in gdbserver).

Oh ok, in my testing I was just letting main return, but I guess it 
reaches a point where the libc calls the exit syscall.  When I call 
pthread_exit, the process stays alive.

>>> So if possible to switch those spots too, I'd recommend/prefer it.
>> 
>> Ok, I'll just replace ptid_get_pid with get_ptrace_pid* in this patch
> 
> Since this is linux-specific code, you should be able to use
> ptid_get_lwp directly.

Ok.

>> and look at using /proc/<pid>/task/<tid> after.  When doing the 
>> latter,
>> do I still have to consider cases where ptid is a 
>> single-process/thread
>> ptid (lwp == 0)?  From my experience, there's always a lwp on Linux, 
>> but
>> perhaps there are some setups I don't know about with which it can 
>> happen?
> 
> Right, on Linux there's always an lwp.  Before NPTL, the
> /proc/<pid>/task/<tid> path didn't exist at all, but we no longer
> support LinuxThreads.

Thanks, I'm sending an updated patch.

Simon


  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-03-22  1:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-21 22:18 Simon Marchi
2017-03-21 23:58 ` Pedro Alves
2017-03-22  0:42   ` Simon Marchi
2017-03-22  1:01     ` Pedro Alves
2017-03-22  1:13       ` Pedro Alves
2017-03-22  1:22       ` Simon Marchi [this message]
2017-03-22  3:03         ` [PATCH v2] " Simon Marchi
2017-03-22 11:28           ` Pedro Alves

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=15f668b8e6bfe802bad5671738f7ef3b@polymtl.ca \
    --to=simon.marchi@polymtl.ca \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=palves@redhat.com \
    --cc=simon.marchi@ericsson.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox