From: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Cc: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@ericsson.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove lwp -> pid conversion in linux_nat_xfer_partial
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 01:22:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <15f668b8e6bfe802bad5671738f7ef3b@polymtl.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cf900897-3e74-aa71-32b8-4f6c96e6a0a6@redhat.com>
On 2017-03-21 21:00, Pedro Alves wrote:
> Nope. If you call "exit", then yes. The kernel kills the whole thread
> group in response to that system call. If the leader does
> pthread_exit, then no, the thread group stays around until all children
> exit too. The kernel won't report the main thread's exit status (i.e.,
> we can't reap that zombie, and we'd hang if we tried a blocking
> waitpid)
> until all the children are reaped first. That's why we have
> linux-nat.c:check_zombie_leaders (and the equivalent in gdbserver).
Oh ok, in my testing I was just letting main return, but I guess it
reaches a point where the libc calls the exit syscall. When I call
pthread_exit, the process stays alive.
>>> So if possible to switch those spots too, I'd recommend/prefer it.
>>
>> Ok, I'll just replace ptid_get_pid with get_ptrace_pid* in this patch
>
> Since this is linux-specific code, you should be able to use
> ptid_get_lwp directly.
Ok.
>> and look at using /proc/<pid>/task/<tid> after. When doing the
>> latter,
>> do I still have to consider cases where ptid is a
>> single-process/thread
>> ptid (lwp == 0)? From my experience, there's always a lwp on Linux,
>> but
>> perhaps there are some setups I don't know about with which it can
>> happen?
>
> Right, on Linux there's always an lwp. Before NPTL, the
> /proc/<pid>/task/<tid> path didn't exist at all, but we no longer
> support LinuxThreads.
Thanks, I'm sending an updated patch.
Simon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-22 1:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-21 22:18 Simon Marchi
2017-03-21 23:58 ` Pedro Alves
2017-03-22 0:42 ` Simon Marchi
2017-03-22 1:01 ` Pedro Alves
2017-03-22 1:13 ` Pedro Alves
2017-03-22 1:22 ` Simon Marchi [this message]
2017-03-22 3:03 ` [PATCH v2] " Simon Marchi
2017-03-22 11:28 ` Pedro Alves
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=15f668b8e6bfe802bad5671738f7ef3b@polymtl.ca \
--to=simon.marchi@polymtl.ca \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=simon.marchi@ericsson.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox