Re: [RFA] DLLs without debugging symbols (repost)

[Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com>]

Sorry, I will look at it again, but I am a bit swamped until next week.
Feel free to send mail to Philippe as well, though.

elena

Raoul Gough writes:
 > "Christopher Faylor" <cgf@redhat.com> wrote in message
 > news:20030206233654.GA12906@redhat.com...
 > > I don't believe that I have the right to check this in,
 > unfortunately.
 > >
 > > I'm just mentioning this in case someone was waiting for me to do
 > > something...
 > 
 > I should probably mention that I can't check these changes in either.
 > I was assuming that Elena Zannoni would be the person to do this, but
 > maybe I should send mail to Philippe De Muyter, who's listed as the
 > coff reader maintainer? AFAIK, the changes were well received on the
 > mailing list, so I expected someone to check them it fairly soon once
 > I got the assignment forms done.
 > 
 > Unless there's still something I have to do before the changes can be
 > accepted, but nobody's mentioned anything so far...
 > 
 > Raoul Gough.
 > 
 > >
 > > cgf
 > >
 > > On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 10:56:37PM -0000, Raoul Gough wrote:
 > > >Apparently my copyright assignment forms have now been processed,
 > so my
 > > >patches for extracting minimal symbols from DLLs could now be
 > entered
 > > >into CVS.  This message includes up-to-date diffs with the latest
 > > >versions of the relevant files, as well as some documentation that
 > I've
 > > >added to gdb.texinfo (basically, there's a new node under the
 > Cygwin
 > > >Native node entitled "Non-debug DLL symbols" which explains some of
 > the
 > > >tricks involved).
 > 
 > __________________________________________________
 > Do You Yahoo!?
 > Everything you'll ever need on one web page
 > from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
 > http://uk.my.yahoo.com