From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2055 invoked by alias); 8 Feb 2003 16:50:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 2044 invoked from network); 8 Feb 2003 16:50:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (172.16.49.200) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 8 Feb 2003 16:50:41 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h18Goff20106 for ; Sat, 8 Feb 2003 11:50:41 -0500 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h18Gofa22929 for ; Sat, 8 Feb 2003 11:50:41 -0500 Received: from localhost.redhat.com (romulus-int.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.46]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h18GoeH03653; Sat, 8 Feb 2003 11:50:40 -0500 Received: by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 469) id E5855FF79; Sat, 8 Feb 2003 11:54:50 -0500 (EST) From: Elena Zannoni MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15941.13914.801372.620291@localhost.redhat.com> Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2003 16:50:00 -0000 To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Cc: ezannoni@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA/RFC] thread local storage tests In-Reply-To: <200302080541.h185fm427022@duracef.shout.net> References: <200302080541.h185fm427022@duracef.shout.net> X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00250.txt.bz2 Michael Elizabeth Chastain writes: > Elena Z writes: > > > What glibc(s) were you using? It may also be due to slightly versions > > of binutils, even though, you are also using HEAD binutils, and it > > should work there. > > glibc 2.2.93-5-rh, the vendor libc that comes with red hat linux 8.0. > > My tables say: 'osversion=red-hat-8.0' and 'libc=vendor'. > I think a more recent glibc is needed. :-( let me find out more. > > Do you have the gdb.logs for the cases that almost work? > > Errr, I already moved them to /dev/null. Damn. But I can re-generate > them easily. > > ftp://ftp.shout.net/pub/users/mec/gdb/2003-02-07a-tls.tar.gz > > The '7a' is because it's a different run than the tables that > I published. > > Everything is in there. There is one directory for each configuration > tested, with a 'gdb-test-run.xml', 'gdb.sum', 'gdb.log', and > 'test.tar.gz'. That last file is a tarball of the actual 'test' > directory which has the juicy executables. > thanks, I'll take a look this evening. elena > Michael C