Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com>
To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec@shout.net>
Cc: carlton@math.stanford.edu, ezannoni@redhat.com,
	gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make tests more flexible
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 17:53:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <15910.62083.363876.797928@localhost.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200301161735.h0GHZAM15898@duracef.shout.net>

Michael Elizabeth Chastain writes:
 > Ah, okay, my head is spinning with all the mail flying around.
 > 
 > David C's log files are the same as my log files.
 > It looks like one bug in both advance.exp and until.exp.
 > For me:
 >   It happened the same way for both dwarf-2 and stabs+.
 >   It happened the same way with all binutils.
 >   It happened with gcc => 3.2.1, gcc-3_2-branch, gcc-3_3-branch, HEAD.
 >   It did NOT happen with gcc => 2.95.3, vendor.
 > 
 > So I think there is only one bug here I think Elena Z can reproduce it
 > by using a gcc v3 compiler with any debug format.
 > 
 > Michael C

Ah ok, I am using gcc version 2.96 20000731 (Red Hat Linux 7.2 2.96-108.7.2).

So, recapping, which one is correct? the old compiler (and the test is
right) or the new compiler (and the test is wrong)?

Elena


  reply	other threads:[~2003-01-16 17:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-01-16 17:35 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-01-16 17:53 ` Elena Zannoni [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-01-16 18:45 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-01-16 18:07 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-01-16 17:27 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-01-16 17:24 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-01-16  4:36 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-01-16  2:05 Elena Zannoni
2003-01-16  4:50 ` David Carlton
2003-01-16 17:19   ` Elena Zannoni
2003-01-16 14:40 ` Fernando Nasser
2003-01-16 16:40   ` Elena Zannoni
2003-01-16 17:10   ` David Carlton
2003-01-16 17:27     ` Elena Zannoni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=15910.62083.363876.797928@localhost.redhat.com \
    --to=ezannoni@redhat.com \
    --cc=carlton@math.stanford.edu \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=mec@shout.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox