From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14094 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2002 18:54:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 14087 invoked from network); 21 Dec 2002 18:54:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 21 Dec 2002 18:54:31 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gBLIRoi17536 for ; Sat, 21 Dec 2002 13:27:50 -0500 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gBLIsJ226746 for ; Sat, 21 Dec 2002 13:54:19 -0500 Received: from localhost.redhat.com (romulus-int.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.46]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gBLIsHL27145; Sat, 21 Dec 2002 13:54:17 -0500 Received: by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 469) id B67A6FF7A; Sat, 21 Dec 2002 13:58:45 -0500 (EST) From: Elena Zannoni MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15876.47588.348150.209939@localhost.redhat.com> Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2002 11:59:00 -0000 To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Cc: carlton@math.stanford.edu, ezannoni@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, jimb@redhat.com Subject: Re: [rfa] delete 'force_return' from lookup_symbol_aux_minsyms In-Reply-To: <200212210710.gBL7ArG31372@duracef.shout.net> References: <200212210710.gBL7ArG31372@duracef.shout.net> X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00606.txt.bz2 Michael Elizabeth Chastain writes: > I'm not following the thread so I'm not sure what patch you're referring > to. But if you want to give me a URL for a patch, any time this weekend > or the beginning of next week is a good time for testbedding. > I am not sure if David committed it yet, but the patch it at the bottom of: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2002-12/msg00560.html Maybe you already tested it! > It takes roughly 5 hours to test all configurations on one version of > gdb now -- I am not in a position to testbed lots of patches. The big > time sink is that I test (all gdb) * (all binutils) and there are lots > of each of them. It's much faster if I run just one test script, but > for a symbol table lookup patch, I want to run the whole suite. > Yes, that's why i thought your system was the perfect one for this. > The build time for gcc is increasing even worse than Gate's Law, also. > (Gates' Law: every 18 months, the speed of software halves). > :-( > Michael C > Gripe, gripe. Elena