Re: PING [RFA] DWARF-2, static data members

[Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com>]

David Carlton writes:
 > On Thu, 5 Dec 2002 15:24:10 -0500, Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com> said:
 > 
 > > Makes sense. Hoever, could you leave the comments inside the 'then' bodies?
 > > Like 
 > > if (blah)
 > > {
 > >  /* C++ static member.  */
 > >  [...]
 > > }
 > 
 > Will do.
 > 
 > > I think it would be useful to add a g++ version number or a date in
 > > the comments, because at some point down the road we may want to
 > > obsolete the old form.
 > 
 > Right, I'll add that.
 > 
 > > Was the patch to gcc submitted, or the gcc PR fixed otherwise?
 > 
 > No, I can't submit the patch to GCC until a version of GDB including
 > this patch is released, because otherwise they'll emit debugging info
 > that we can't handle.
 > 

I know, but I figured that, given their 'freeze' cycles, it could
get reviewed in the meantime.

Speaking of which, I've heard rumours that the Dberlin patch for
namespace debug info has been reviewed... Indeed it has:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2002-11/msg00978.html

Elena

 > I'll commit it with the changes to the comments that you requested.
 > 
 > David Carlton
 > carlton@math.stanford.edu