From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23256 invoked by alias); 22 Nov 2002 21:02:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 23248 invoked from network); 22 Nov 2002 21:02:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 22 Nov 2002 21:02:33 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gAMKcSP00681 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 15:38:28 -0500 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gAML2WD19389 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 16:02:32 -0500 Received: from localhost.redhat.com (romulus-int.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.46]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gAML2Vw27060; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 16:02:31 -0500 Received: by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 469) id 47213FF79; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 15:58:17 -0500 (EST) From: Elena Zannoni MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15838.39528.911307.854917@localhost.redhat.com> Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 13:02:00 -0000 To: Jim Blandy Cc: Elena Zannoni , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] doc/Makefile.in install In-Reply-To: References: <15838.36534.883345.847460@localhost.redhat.com> X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00559.txt.bz2 Jim Blandy writes: > Elena Zannoni writes: > > > 'make install' in the doc directory wasn't doing anything useful.... > > > > Is this ok? (lifted from bfd/doc's makefile) > > > > Elena > > > > > > 2002-11-22 Elena Zannoni > > > > * Makefile.in (install): Make install do some real work. > > > > Index: Makefile.in > > =================================================================== > > RCS file: /cvs/uberbaum/gdb/doc/Makefile.in,v > > retrieving revision 1.23 > > diff -u -p -r1.23 Makefile.in > > --- Makefile.in 20 Nov 2002 00:47:59 -0000 1.23 > > +++ Makefile.in 22 Nov 2002 20:10:08 -0000 > > @@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ STABS_DOC_FILES = \ > > #### Host, target, and site specific Makefile fragments come in here. > > ### > > > > -all install: > > +all: > > > > info: $(INFO_DEPS) > > dvi: gdb.dvi gdbint.dvi stabs.dvi refcard.dvi > > @@ -432,3 +432,4 @@ distclean: clean > > maintainer-clean realclean: distclean > > rm -f GDBvn.texi *.info* *.dvi *.ps *.html *.pdf > > > > +install: install-info > > I think, at some point in the distant past, it was controversial > whether packages should install their info files by default. I think > that was back when disks were much smaller than they are now. > Nowadays most packages install their info by default, so there's no > reason for GDB not to do so as well. I don't know, but bfd has this comment: # We want install to imply install-info as per GNU standards, despite the # cygnus option. install: install-info seems it was something Cygnus did and never was changed back. committed. Elena