From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26978 invoked by alias); 22 Oct 2002 14:28:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 26969 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2002 14:28:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 22 Oct 2002 14:28:01 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g9ME6hw04081 for ; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 10:06:43 -0400 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g9MES0f18551; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 10:28:00 -0400 Received: from localhost.redhat.com (IDENT:CJ9CqcAe+UYU+7fcNC7qtTBXL81BC/KR@tooth.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.29]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g9MERxw21501; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 10:27:59 -0400 Received: by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 469) id A3EEBFF79; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 10:25:17 -0400 (EDT) From: Elena Zannoni MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15797.24525.445748.958598@localhost.redhat.com> Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 07:28:00 -0000 To: "J. Johnston" Cc: Elena Zannoni , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Patch for gdb/mi 604 In-Reply-To: <3DB487CB.7F21B13@redhat.com> References: <3D9B3D4D.C0B57920@redhat.com> <15796.32490.200752.700605@localhost.redhat.com> <3DB487CB.7F21B13@redhat.com> X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg00396.txt.bz2 J. Johnston writes: > Elena Zannoni wrote: > > > > J. Johnston writes: > > > The following patches mi-main.c to turn on the console output prefix prior > > > to outputting the gdb startup messages. The code checks for mi level > > > and defers to old behavior for mi1. > > > > > > Ok to commit? > > > > > > > Wouldn't this affect the testsuite as well? > > Or is this behavior not tested? > > > > Elena > > > > It does not affect the testsuite. The testsuite startup code looks for > the gdb prompt or some form of error indication, but does not specifically > look at the start-up message. > Hmm, I wonder whether now it should. Since we are expecting a specific behavior it might as well be tested. Thoughts? Elena