From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15958 invoked by alias); 2 Oct 2002 15:30:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 15927 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2002 15:30:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 2 Oct 2002 15:30:26 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g92FBZi17282 for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2002 11:11:35 -0400 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g92FUPf11086 for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2002 11:30:25 -0400 Received: from localhost.redhat.com (IDENT:root@tooth.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.29]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g92FUP906545 for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2002 11:30:25 -0400 Received: by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 469) id F41F1FF79; Wed, 2 Oct 2002 11:28:02 -0400 (EDT) From: Elena Zannoni MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15771.4226.810235.889426@localhost.redhat.com> Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2002 08:30:00 -0000 To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] TLS support part 3 In-Reply-To: <20021002145410.GA22578@nevyn.them.org> References: <15770.64626.434733.368375@localhost.redhat.com> <20021002145410.GA22578@nevyn.them.org> X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg00053.txt.bz2 Daniel Jacobowitz writes: > On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 10:02:26AM -0400, Elena Zannoni wrote: > > > > Last patch. These are the configure machinery changes. > > Pending resolution of the config.in diffs....(as posted on gdb@) > > Well, half of those are the result of not rerunning autoheader; and the > other half are a known issue between two different versions of > autoconf/autoheader. So they look OK to me. > Hmpf! I used straight autoheader/autoconf 2.13. I guess I should have used the binutils branch one? Elena > > -- > Daniel Jacobowitz > MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer