Re: [RFA/MI testsuite] Add mi_runto

[Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com>]

Keith Seitz writes:
 > On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, Elena Zannoni wrote:
 > 
 > > Same question as for the other patch. How does this interact with 
 > > mi_run_to?
 > > Do we need both versions?
 > 
 > Like mi_step/next_to, I think that I could have made a better decision to 
 > implement this in terms of mi_run_to_helper, but there is still one 
 > shortcoming, though: mi_run_to does not know how to start the target 
 > running, while mi_runto does.
 > 
 > If you'd like I can rewrite both of these patches using mi_run_to procs. 
 > (I'll just assume that you'd like that and start on that. I don't really 
 > know right now what I was thinking when I rewrote this all again.)
 > 
 > Keith
 > 

Yes, please. Thanks. It will be easier to maintain if we have only one
copy of these functions.

Elena