From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28410 invoked by alias); 9 Sep 2002 19:33:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 28403 invoked from network); 9 Sep 2002 19:33:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO touchme.toronto.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 9 Sep 2002 19:33:36 -0000 Received: from tooth.toronto.redhat.com (tooth.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.29]) by touchme.toronto.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A312B8833; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 15:33:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from bje@localhost) by tooth.toronto.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g89JXZG01990; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 15:33:35 -0400 From: Ben Elliston MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15740.63375.453654.24236@tooth.toronto.redhat.com> Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2002 12:33:00 -0000 To: Andrew Cagney Cc: Fernando Nasser , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] testsuite cleanups In-Reply-To: <3D7CDA8A.9080508@ges.redhat.com> References: <15739.31585.40750.573090@tooth.toronto.redhat.com> <3D7CDA8A.9080508@ges.redhat.com> X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00126.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Cagney writes: Andrew> For GDB, I think the entire comment can simply be removed. Andrew> Ever since 5.0, the files have been bundled in with GDB so I Andrew> don't think the comment even applies. That sounds sensible -- I agree. Shall I submit a new patch which just removes those comments? Ben