From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9580 invoked by alias); 27 Aug 2002 22:42:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 9572 invoked from network); 27 Aug 2002 22:42:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO deimos.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.19.190) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 27 Aug 2002 22:42:38 -0000 Received: from hplms2.hpl.hp.com (hplms2.hpl.hp.com [15.0.152.33]) by deimos.hpl.hp.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_24419)/HPL-PA Relay) with ESMTP id PAA20620; Tue, 27 Aug 2002 15:42:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from napali.hpl.hp.com (napali.hpl.hp.com [15.4.89.123]) by hplms2.hpl.hp.com (8.10.2/8.10.2 HPL-PA Hub) with ESMTP id g7RMgXn26689; Tue, 27 Aug 2002 15:42:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from napali.hpl.hp.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by napali.hpl.hp.com (8.12.2/8.12.2/Debian -5) with ESMTP id g7RMgXuh008421; Tue, 27 Aug 2002 15:42:33 -0700 Received: (from davidm@localhost) by napali.hpl.hp.com (8.12.2/8.12.2/Debian -5) id g7RMgWX4008417; Tue, 27 Aug 2002 15:42:32 -0700 From: David Mosberger MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15724.88.573900.50003@napali.hpl.hp.com> Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 16:28:00 -0000 To: Michael Snyder Cc: davidm@hpl.hp.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, ac131313@ges.redhat.com, kevinb@redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch] unwind support for gdb/ia64 In-Reply-To: <3D6BE7DB.DEE78AE0@redhat.com> References: <200207102315.g6ANFMHh022230@napali.hpl.hp.com> <3D6AE2ED.53D9E877@redhat.com> <15722.62020.64894.433304@napali.hpl.hp.com> <3D6BE7DB.DEE78AE0@redhat.com> Reply-To: davidm@hpl.hp.com X-SW-Source: 2002-08/txt/msg00925.txt.bz2 >>>>> On Tue, 27 Aug 2002 13:58:03 -0700, Michael Snyder said: Michael> Has it been resolved? >> No, unfortunately. >> I'd really like to see libunwind support in gcc, so I'd welcome >> any help in making this happen. Michael> Well, I can't review the ia64 parts, but the rest of it is Michael> fine. Oops, I misread your mail. I thought this was about gcc, not gdb. ;-( The ia64-portion of the gdb patches are waiting for the legal paper work (it's making progress, but it's slow going...). However, if you could apply the non-ia64 specific part, that would be great. --david